Opensee leads in Risk Data Aggregation in Chartis RiskTech Quadrant
Learn more
Learn how data platforms enable banks to integrate FP&A with treasury planning, enhancing compliance, resource allocation, and resilience.
Maintaining a robust financial position is fundamental to ensuring the resilience of a financial institution, particularly in a highly regulated and risk-prone environment. This financial stability depends heavily on two key pillars: capital and liquidity management. Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A) exercises play a central role in supporting these pillars by providing an ongoing assessment of a bank’s financial performance, forecasting future needs, and ensuring alignment with both internal strategic goals and regulatory requirements. In this context, linking FP&A exercises with capital and liquidity planning is of paramount importance. This linkage not only enables banks to anticipate future challenges, optimize resources, and support business growth, but also ensures they remain compliant with evolving regulatory standards such as Basel IV.
FP&A is a continuous process that involves budgeting, forecasting, and analyzing a bank’s financial performance. It goes beyond traditional financial reporting by offering strategic insights that guide decision-making. FP&A teams are responsible for analyzing past financial data, creating models to predict future outcomes, and helping senior management make informed decisions about resource allocation, investments, and risk management.
In the banking industry, FP&A exercises are particularly important as banks operate in a dynamic and complex environment. Banks must manage a wide range of risks (credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, etc.), meet stringent regulatory requirements, and ensure they have sufficient capital and liquidity to weather financial shocks. This makes the FP&A process more complex compared to non-financial sectors, as it must consider regulatory requirements, macroeconomic conditions, and changing market dynamics in its projections.
FP&A also encompasses stress testing, scenario analysis, and other forecasting techniques that simulate the bank’s performance under various economic conditions, including adverse scenarios. These exercises help identify potential vulnerabilities in the bank’s financial structure and allow management to take preemptive actions to address those risks.
Capital planning is a critical element of a bank’s FP&A process. It involves determining the amount of capital that the bank needs to support its operations, manage risks, and meet regulatory requirements. Banks must maintain a certain level of capital to absorb losses and remain solvent in times of financial stress. Regulatory frameworks like Basel III require banks to hold sufficient capital based on their risk-weighted assets to ensure stability and avoid systemic risk in the banking sector.
Linking FP&A with capital planning is essential, especially for the following points:
Regulatory bodies, such as the PRA (Prudential Regulation Authority) in the UK or the ECB (European Central Bank) in the Eurozone, closely monitor banks’ capital adequacy. FP&A exercises must account for the regulatory capital requirements to ensure compliance with minimum capital ratios, such as the Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio, Tier 1 capital ratio, and Total Capital ratio. Failing to meet these requirements can result in sanctions, fines, or restrictions on operations, including dividend payouts and bonus distributions.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act and subsequent regulatory changes, US banks are subject to stringent capital adequacy requirements, modeled largely on the Basel III international framework but with additional domestic provisions like CCAR. CCAR is an annual regulatory exercise for large US banks to assess their capital adequacy and planned capital distributions (dividends and share buybacks). It is a critical link between FP&A and capital planning, as banks must submit detailed capital plans to the Federal Reserve based on projections from FP&A.
By integrating FP&A exercises with capital planning, banks can continuously assess their capital needs and ensure they are in line with both regulatory expectations and internal risk appetites. This allows banks to take proactive steps, such as raising additional capital, adjusting asset portfolios, or limiting risk exposures, before regulatory capital ratios are breached.
Stress testing is a vital tool in capital planning and a mandatory requirement under regulatory frameworks like Basel III. FP&A teams use stress testing to evaluate how a bank’s capital position would perform under adverse economic conditions, such as a severe recession or a financial market shock. These tests help banks assess the adequacy of their capital buffers in times of stress.
The results of stress testing, which are often integrated into FP&A exercises, directly impact capital planning. If stress test results show that the bank would fall below regulatory capital ratios in a downturn, the bank must adjust its capital plans accordingly. This could involve building up additional capital buffers, raising new equity, or reducing risk-weighted assets. Thus, the FP&A process provides a forward-looking view that helps align capital planning with the bank’s broader risk management strategy.
In the US, CCAR includes a mandatory stress testing component, known as the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST). It requires banks to project their capital positions under both baseline and severely adverse economic scenarios. FP&A exercises are essential in this process because they produce the financial forecasts and models that inform these projections, building economic scenarios and translating them into potential impacts on capital. They model balance sheets, income statements, and other financial metrics under stress scenarios, simulating loan loss provisions, revenue shocks, and operational risk impacts.
Another critical link between FP&A and capital planning is capital allocation. FP&A exercises assess the profitability and return on capital of different business units, products, and geographies. By understanding which areas of the bank generate the highest returns relative to the capital they consume, banks can allocate capital more efficiently and improve overall profitability.
For instance, if FP&A analysis shows that a particular business unit has a low return on risk-weighted assets, management may decide to reallocate capital to higher-performing areas. This ensures that the bank’s capital is used in the most productive way, enhancing shareholder value and maintaining financial resilience.
In the US, banks must submit capital plans as part of CCAR, detailing how they will allocate capital over a given planning horizon (usually two to three years). These plans include proposed capital distributions, such as dividends and stock buybacks. The Fed reviews these plans to ensure they are consistent with maintaining capital adequacy under stress.
FP&A exercises are critical in determining the sustainability of these distributions. The insights gained from FP&A help banks decide how much capital they can return to shareholders while still maintaining regulatory compliance and financial stability. If the Federal Reserve deems a bank’s capital plan unsatisfactory, it can restrict capital distributions, which directly impacts shareholder value and market perception.
Liquidity planning is equally important for the overall health of a bank. Liquidity refers to a bank’s ability to meet its short-term obligations as they come due, without having to sell assets at a loss or borrow at punitive rates. Ensuring adequate liquidity is essential for a bank’s ongoing operations and financial stability.
Linking FP&A exercises with liquidity planning allows banks to:
Similar to capital requirements, banks are subject to regulatory liquidity requirements. Key metrics include the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), which ensure that banks have enough liquid assets (HQLA) to survive short-term liquidity shocks and maintain stable funding over a longer period. FP&A exercises incorporate these metrics into liquidity forecasts to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.
A key component of liquidity planning is cash flow forecasting, which is integrated into FP&A exercises. Accurate forecasting helps banks anticipate periods of liquidity strain and plan accordingly. These forecasts consider factors such as loan disbursements and repayments, deposit inflows and withdrawals, and operating expenses, including interest payments.
In the US, the repayment (or prepayment) risk, particularly in the context of loans and mortgages, have significant implications for liquidity risk and cash flow forecasting. While providing short-term liquidity for the bank, it also introduces several risks and challenges related to liquidity management, forecasting, and interest rate sensitivity.
For example, if FP&A analysis predicts a shortfall in liquid assets during a particular period, the bank can take preemptive actions such as raising additional funding, selling assets, or reducing lending activity to preserve liquidity.
Liquidity planning also involves preparing for unexpected liquidity shocks, such as a sudden withdrawal of deposits or a market-wide funding crisis. FP&A exercises help identify potential liquidity gaps and develop contingency funding plans to address them. These plans may include accessing central bank facilities, drawing on committed credit lines, or tapping into the repo markets.
By linking FP&A with liquidity planning, banks can ensure they have a comprehensive view of their liquidity needs and are prepared to manage liquidity risks effectively. This helps prevent liquidity crises, which can have catastrophic consequences for a bank’s solvency and reputation.
The increasing complexity of financial planning in the banking industry has led to greater reliance on data infrastructure and advanced analytical tools. Data platform challenges include handling vast amounts of financial, market, and risk data from multiple, often fragmented sources. Key issues are data silos, inconsistent formats, lack of real-time integration, and limited access to on-demand insights. These problems hinder effective cash flow forecasting, liquidity management, and scenario analysis, which are essential for aligning capital and liquidity strategies with business needs.
A scalable data management and analytics platform like Opensee is critical for overcoming these challenges. It integrates data from various sources, ensuring consistency, accuracy, and real-time availability. Additionally, the platform’s ability to process large datasets efficiently enables teams to perform simulations on the fly on long historical ranges, which is crucial for dynamic forecasting and scenario planning. This capability allows FP&A and Treasury teams to test multiple market and economic conditions rapidly, adjusting strategies in real time to mitigate risks and seize opportunities.
The combination of scalable data management, advanced real-time analytics and advanced simulations empowers more accurate decision-making and robust financial planning in volatile environments.
Linking FP&A exercises with capital and liquidity planning is essential for the long-term financial health and stability of banks. By integrating these processes, banks can ensure they have adequate capital and liquidity buffers to manage risks, meet regulatory requirements, and support growth. Specific local requirements, especially in the US which includes the CCAR process, add to the complexity of the exercise and increase the requirements in terms of data platform and architecture.
Moreover, the insights gained from FP&A exercises enable banks to allocate resources efficiently, optimize profitability, and prepare for adverse economic conditions. As the banking industry continues to evolve and face new challenges, the alignment of FP&A, capital planning, and liquidity management will remain a critical focus for financial institutions looking to stay competitive and resilient in a dynamic market environment.
